U.S. Apologizes to Pakistan for November Deaths

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has officially apologized to the nation of Pakistan after the U.S. killed 24 Pakistanis in November in an airstrike gone awry—leading the Pakistanis to reopen supply lines to U.S. troops in Afghanistan, which will make it much quicker and cheaper to transport supplies.

For the past seven months, the U.S. has had to incur costs of an additional $100 million a month because it had to take longer, winding routes to Afghanistan through Russia and Central Asia. Pakistan has been waiting for the apology for months, but the Obama administration has been reluctant to issue one in an election year, fearful of the Republican line of attack.

Clinton had a conversation with Pakistani Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar and expressed her condolences for the death, though she stopped short of aologizing for the incident itself, which severely damaged already strained relations between the two countries.

“We are sorry for the losses suffered by the Pakistani military,” Clinton said in a statement, recounting her discussion with Khar. “I offered our sincere condolences to the families of the Pakistani soldiers who lost their lives. Foreign Minister Khar and I acknowledged the mistakes that resulted in the loss of Pakistani military lives.”

CBS News has reported that at least 7,000 truckloads of equipment bound for the U.S. military in Afghanistan have been stranded in Pakistan. Now that the supply lines have been reopened, Pentagon officials estimate it will take about two months to clear that backlog which stretches some 900 miles from the border to the port of Karachi.

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top