Roger Federer Advances to Semis To Play Djokovic at Wimbledon

Roger Federer was at his graceful, willful, impeccable best today in a straight-set demolition of Russian Mikhail Youzhny on Centre Court at Wimbledon today.

The 6-1, 6-2, 6-2 win by Federer vaults him into the semifinals, the first time he has been there at Wimbledon in three years. The win sets up a much-anticipated semifinal showdown between Federer and defending champion Novak Djokovic, who has been the best tennis player in the world over the past year, ranked number one since last August.

Djokovic won his first Wimbledon tital last year by beating Rafael Nadal in the finals last year. When Nadal was ousted in the second round this year by losing to 100th-ranked Lukas Rosol, it opened a door extremely wide for Federer. But he still has to get through Djokovic to have a chance to win his seventh Wimbledon title.

Amazingly, Federer and Djokovic have never played each other at Wimbledon.

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top