Postal Workers Hold Hunger Strike to Protest Budget Cuts

Postal workers don’t usually draw attention, but that is exactly what ten mail carriers in Washington D.C. are doing with a hunger strike. The strike, which started yesterday, is in protest of budget cuts, post office closures and changes in the pension system for postal employees. It will last for four days. In addition to protesting at the nation’s capital, there are plans for strikes in other major cities including New York and Chicago, according to Reuters.

Democratic Rep. Dennis Kucinich led a rally in front of the Capitol building on Monday. “I will continue to fight any efforts to weaken the Postal Service, including any efforts to privatize essential services,” Kucinich said to the crowd. “There are ways to generate revenue without cutting jobs, essential services and closing vital post office branches in communities that rely on them.”

The agency has lost over 3 billion dollars in 2012 and has offered buyouts to reduce expenses. The carriers think there is another way to fix this issue without taking away jobs and place the blame in one direction. “Congress created the problem, Congress can fix it,” Jamie Partridge, a carrier from Oregon, said to Reuters.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top