Obama Hits Romney Hard in Speech to Hispanic Officials

After dueling speeches before the National Association of Latino Elected Officials this past week, it is President Obama who furthered solidified his commanding lead among Hispanics while Republican challenger Mitt Romney struggled to connect with a skeptical crowd that had heard plenty from Romney in the past that was hostile to their interests.

Obama was quick to remind the crowd yesterday that Romney had promised to veto the Dream Act, a path to citizenship for young immigrants that the president has pushed but Republicans in Congress have staunchly opposed. Romney has stated his firm opposition to the Dream Act, while Obama decided to circumvent Congress by announcing he would sign an executive order ceasing the deportation of Latinos under 30 with clean records who have been in the country at least five years.

“I refused to keep looking young people in the eye, deserving young people in the eye, and tell them tough luck,” he said to a standing ovation. “Your speaker from yesterday has a different view. In a speech he said that when he makes a promise to you, he’ll keep it. Well he has promised to veto the DREAM Act, and we should take him at his word.”

“I’m just sayin’,” he added, to laughter.

A new poll released yesterday by Latino Decisions and America’s Voice, taken after Obama’s immigration announcement, put his lead over Romney in five key Latino battleground states—including Florida, Colorado and Virginia—at 63 to 27 percent. Even some Republicans acknowledge this is virtually insurmountable.

“Obama giving my Democrat colleagues a lot more to work with, than Romney gave me yesterday at #NALEO. It ain’t going to be easy, folks,” Ana Navarro, who was national Hispanic co-chairwoman for McCain in 2008, wrote on Twitter.

 

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top