The Today Show Dropping Ann Curry

As The Today Show tries to figure out how to stave off the charge by Good Morning, America, NBC executives apparently have decided that co-host Ann Curry should get the blame for the show’s ratings dip. The New York Times broke the story that NBC executives are in talks with Curry to figure out how they can move her into another role, perhaps as a foreign correspondent, capitalizing on one of her biggest strengths.

When Good Morning America beat Today in the ratings battle in April for the first time in 16 years, television insiders began to speculate that part of the problem was the lack of chemistry between Curry and Matt Lauer. But of course Lauer, who just renegotiated his contract in April for a reported $25 million a year, will never be in danger of being moved, as he is considered one of the most valuable properties in television. Because it generates hundreds of million of dollars in ad revenue and is credited with inventing the morning show format, the dramas of the Today Show co-hosts have always received outsized attention, from Tom Brokaw to Jane Pauley to Bryant Gumbel to Katie Couric to Meredith Vieira and now Ann Curry, who was just promoted to replace Vieira last June.

Lauer has said Curry has “the biggest heart in television” and, indeed, she can sometimes seem close to tears when she is reporting on tragedies in the U.S. and around the world. But it is precisely her sensitivity and compassion that has endeared her to many fans, who might be so disgusted by attempts to oust her that such a move could lead to a ratings plunge for Today, leaving Good Morning America atop the heap.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top