Republicans Making Plans to Repeal Healthcare Law

With a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court expected in the next two weeks on the Obama healthcare law, Republicans are making plans for how they will scrap the elements of the law that might still be standing if the court strikes it down.

Because several of the large insurers have said they will retain certain aspects of the law, such as allowing children up to age 26 to stay on their parents’ plans, Republicans in Congress say they will feel no pressure to immediately pass a new law to replace Obama’s.

Obamacare, as it has become known, was pushed through after intense debate in Congress, but the law has failed to catch on in popularity across the country—primarily because many of its measures intended to lower healthcare costs have yet to take effect. This leaves Republicans with that idea that Americans want the law to be repealed. But according to a story on NPR, they aren’t eager to propose a new law or take any action before the presidential election.

After the Supreme Court’s decision, “the goal is to repeal anything that is left standing,” said Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., a Republican party leader.

“We ought to go step by step to lower the cost,” he said, a view repeated by other Republicans.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top