Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed Accused of Cronyism

Atlanta’s Mayor Kasim Reed has been accused of “cronyism,” or favoritism, in the distribution of several high-paying contracts at Hartsfield-Jackson Airport. SSP America, the accuser in this case, claims that its bid to place its restaurant properties in the Atlanta airport’s new international terminal was rejected without merit, so that the “the mayor’s friends” could take over the space.

“We’ve got the chairman of the mayor’s campaign; we’ve got one of his major fundraisers out there—those two alone are in the vast majority of the properties out in the airport for concessions,” Ken Hodges, an attorney for SSP America told Atlanta’s Fox 5 News.

Court filings from SSP America state that the mayor made sure that his political allies received the bids in question. One of Mayor Reed’s attorneys, Mark Trigg, dismissed the charges as “a waste of taypayer dollars.” In the filing Hodges mentioned a red flag raised by the Federal Aviation Administration, regarding whether the winning bidders were qualified as “disadvantaged businesses.”

Trigg maintains that the mayor had no direct involvement with the process, and that the Georgia Department of Transportation makes the certifications and the city is required to accept them.

Still, Hodges and SSP America appear certain that the mayor is responsible. “The mayor has had a hand in this all along. We had emails, we had other evidence to support that and yet the mayor is going to hide behind his lawyers and not come forth and testify,” said Hodges.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top