Surprise: Southern Primary Voters Selected Anybody But Obama

It’s no secret that President Obama is unpopular among white voters in the South—so as further evidence we have yesterday’s Democratic primary results in Arkansas and Kentucky.

In Kentucky, which has a closed primary, meaning only registered Democrats can vote, 42 percent of voters chose “uncommitted” rather than vote for the President. In Arkansas, which has an open primary, meaning voters can select a ballot for either party, a Tennessee attorney named John Wolfe was grabbing about 40 percent of the Democratic votes.

This comes a week after a Texas inmate garnered 41 percent of the vote in West Virginia’s Democratic primary.

While some pundits will want to make a big deal out of these results, and claim that they show the President’s vulnerability in November, let’s not pretend for a second we don’t know what’s really going on here. Anyone who has spent time in the South over the past four years knows that many whites in the region are still in a state of apoplectic disbelief that a black man in actually the leader of the free world. This disbelief crosses party lines, though it is clearly more prevalent among white Republicans, who have been known to cruise around with bumper stickers on their pickups that say things like “Don’t Re-Nig in 2012.” So we can save all the pretend shock that white voters in the South chose an inmate or a white dude from another state over Obama. Those “candidates” had the one campaign platform the President lacks: white skin.

 

 

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top