Doctor Who Helped The CIA Locate Osama Bin Laden Convicted of Treason In Pakistan

A Pakistani doctor who aided the CIA in the capture of Osama Bin Laden has been convicted of treason in his native Pakistan, according to a senior official of the Pakistani government. Shakil Afridi has been sentenced to 33 years and fined $3,500. He will be able to appeal the decision in two months. He is currently serving his time at Central Prison in Peshawar.

Afridi was charged because he assisted the United States by hosting a fake vaccination drive to collect a DNA sample from Osama Bin Laden and anyone associated with him so the CIA could pinpoint his location. Various American officials have called for his release. “He was not in any way treasonous towards Pakistan…Pakistan and the United States have a common cause here against terrorism,” said U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, who was director of the CIA during the Bin Laden operation. “For them to take this kind of action against somebody who was helping to go after terrorism, I just think is a real mistake on their part.”

This conviction is an added source of contention between the United States and Pakistan, who have been at odds since Pakistan closed a supply line that ran between their country and Afghanistan. Afridi was convicted under a law that forgoes the death penalty for treason. Under traditional Pakistani law, Afridi would have been put to death. Pakistani officials feel Afridi’s actions were a potential threat to their nation. “He was working for a foreign spy agency,” said an anonymous official. “We are looking after our national interests.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top