With No Rest, Lakers Have A Big Question To Answer Tonight

Can Kobe Bryant and Pau Gasol get it done tonight?

Kobe Bryant, a game after failing miserably in the clutch, returned to himself Friday night in leading the Los Angeles Lakers to a desperation 99-96 victory over the Oklahoma Thunder. But the young and free-wheeling team still lead the veteran, plodding Lakers 2-1 in the series, begging a question:

How much energy remains within the Lakers?

The slower, bigger, older team must face the youthful, spry, physically stellar Thunder tonight at the Staples Center, less than 24 hours after the conclusion of L.A.’s dramatic Game 3 win that, at the very least, prolonged its season.

Bryant, who had 36 points and was 18-for-18 from the foul line, had a simple answer: “Plenty,” he said.

That sounds good, but is it reasonable that the Lakers can come back on no rest and muster the effort needed to contain the explosive Thunder?

On that question, Bryant was philosphical but honest. “If it’s an up-and-down game,” he said. “We don’t have a shot. . . ‘We’ve got to just slow down the game. Play our pace, play our tempo, and we’ll give ourselves a great opportunity.”

They did that much of Friday night. Bryant shot horribly from the floor — 9-for-25 — but he attacked the basket and forced OKC to make a strong defensive play or foul him. At the line, he was money.

In fact, the Lakers’ missed but one of 43 foul shots — by Andrew Bynum. “We fouled too much,” Thunder coach Scott Brooks said, simply.

Oklahoma City’s bench celebrated a 92-87 lead on Westbrook’s breakaway dunk with 2:55 to play, but the Lakers trimmed away with Gasol’s free throws, Bryant’s layup and several possessions of tenacious defense. Bryant’s free throws put the Lakers ahead with 1:09 to play.

Kevin Durant immediately hit a go-ahead jumper with a hand squarely in his face, but Bryant added two more free throws – his 15th and 16th – to put Los Angeles ahead 95-94. The Thunder finished 26 of 28 from the line, but the Lakers went 17 for 18 in the fourth quarter alone.

”We knew they were going to approach the game with a lot of intensity down 0-2,” Durant said. ”We did a great job of fighting back and taking a lead. We can play any type of basketball. That’s what’s good about our team. We can play fast. We can play slow. . . We just didn’t come out on top.”

A Lakers win tonight send the series back to Oklahoma tied at 2-2. Last time the Lakers were there, they blew a seven-point lead in the last two minutes, something they rue. An L.A. loss gives OKC a chance to close of Los Angeles in Game 5. So, tonight’s game is the key game in the series.

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top