Charles Rangel’s Challenger Backed by Conservative Super PAC

The New York state senator challenging Rep. Charles Rangel for his longtime Harlem Congressional seat may be receiving help from an unexpected source, a right-wing Texas-based super PAC, according to a story on the Amsterdam News website. But the challenger, Sen. Adriano Espaillat, claimed through a spokesman that he’s not aware of any support from a SuperPAC known as the Campaign for Primary Accountability (CPA), based in Houston.

It is highly unusual for a Texas-based SuperPAC with a history of backing conservative causes to inject itself into a Harlem Congressional race, but that’s exactly what’s going on in Rangel’s district.

“Senator Espaillat’s solid record and proven popular support make him a strong, credible challenger who will work for the people of his district when he goes to Congress,” said the CPA in a publicly released statement. “Adriano Espaillat represents a new generation and brings a fresh perspective sorely needed in Washington. Charlie Rangel has sadly become the model of how some long-term incumbents become too comfortable with the special interests that infest Washington.”

But when the Amsterdam News asked Espaillat spokesman Ibrahim Khan about the endorsement, he claimed that Espaillat had never heard of the super PAC and hadn’t been endorsed by any PAC.

The entire matter shows how much the 81-year-old Rangel has been weakened by his ethics lapses, that a conservative leaning group all the way in Texas believes it can make some headway in Harlem challenging him for a seat he has had a vise grip on for 42 years.

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top