Will Romney and Republicans Try to Use Gay Marriage Against Obama?

Now that President Obama has publicly stated his support for gay marriage, will the Republican Party hop on his admission and try to use his words against him in the campaign?

That’s the question many pundits and campaign junkies are asking themselves today amidst the enormous media firestorm that has been created around the president’s interview with Robin Roberts on ABC News. Words like “historic” and “groundbreaking” and “courageous” have been used to describe the pronouncement of the president, who was the first sitting president in U.S. history to publicly support gay marriage.

If you’re Mitt Romney, you may not feel like the word “courageous” being attached to the incumbent is going to be much of a benefit to you—particularly if it comes just days after words like “weak” and “cowardly” were attached to you for failing to step forward and scold one of your supporters for suggesting that the president should be tried for treason.

So even after Republicans have spent the past year setting up a campaign focused on the economy—and seemingly dropping to their knees and praying that as many Americans as possible stay out of work until November—it will be fascinating to see if they now try to pivot away from the economy and try to leap onto the gay marriage bandwagon for some traction. This is a party that has been brilliant in the past at using social issues like gay marriage and abortion to fire up the base and get those contributions pouring in and those conservatives running to the voting booth. Though recent polls have suggested that the public has many issues it considers more important than gay marriage, and with the public split down the middle on support of gay marriage (though Republicans are much more likely to oppose it), perhaps we have finally reached a moment in history when the Republicans will just let this one pass and continue to hit the economy.

But then again, suggesting that Republicans will stay away from gay marriage this time might be like asking whether pigs will grow wings and take flight in the morning.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top