Rep. John Conyers Accuses Republicans of Attacking Women

By ABS Contributor | Published on May 9, 2012

Congressional hearings are supposed to be genteel affairs where very few fireworks occur, but at a hearing on the Violence Against Women act, fiery Rep. John Conyers was through with the niceties. Conyers blasted his Republican colleagues for making so many changes to the bipartisan bill that had come over to the House from the Senate that he said it is actually “a step backwards and a flat-out attack on women.”

Conyers, a Michigan Democrat, claimed that the House Republican changes eliminate protections for immigrant women, Native Americans and the LGBT community.

“This bill is a move backwards,” Conyers told the committee. “I can assure you, you will not get the vote of the Democratic side of this committee because it is a step backwards and a flat-out attack on women.”

Conyers listed the ways that the GOP bill weakens protections for women—by eliminating confidentiality protections for immigrant women who have been abused, blocking a pathway to citizenship for immigrant witnesses who cooperate with police on domestic violence cases and stripping way protection for LGBT and Native American victims. The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, a coalition of more than 200 civil rights groups, is opposed to the House Republican version of the bill, Conyers pointed out.

But in defending their version of the bill, House Republicans said their approach actually “enhances” protections for immigrants because too many women have been faking domestic abuse in order to get citizenship.

Subscribe To The ABS Newsletter — Get our stories in your inbox.

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Give once Give monthly Support another way