Rep. John Conyers Accuses Republicans of Attacking Women

Congressional hearings are supposed to be genteel affairs where very few fireworks occur, but at a hearing on the Violence Against Women act, fiery Rep. John Conyers was through with the niceties. Conyers blasted his Republican colleagues for making so many changes to the bipartisan bill that had come over to the House from the Senate that he said it is actually “a step backwards and a flat-out attack on women.”

Conyers, a Michigan Democrat, claimed that the House Republican changes eliminate protections for immigrant women, Native Americans and the LGBT community.

“This bill is a move backwards,” Conyers told the committee. “I can assure you, you will not get the vote of the Democratic side of this committee because it is a step backwards and a flat-out attack on women.”

Conyers listed the ways that the GOP bill weakens protections for women—by eliminating confidentiality protections for immigrant women who have been abused, blocking a pathway to citizenship for immigrant witnesses who cooperate with police on domestic violence cases and stripping way protection for LGBT and Native American victims. The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, a coalition of more than 200 civil rights groups, is opposed to the House Republican version of the bill, Conyers pointed out.

But in defending their version of the bill, House Republicans said their approach actually “enhances” protections for immigrants because too many women have been faking domestic abuse in order to get citizenship.

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top