Ewing A Candidate for Bobcats’ Head Coach Job

Patrick Ewing's expertise improved Dwight Howard's game.

Patrick Ewing, one of the most-liked and respected players of his era — and a pretty productive one, too — is among a group of candidates to interview f0r the Charlotte Bobcats’ head coach position.

For those who knew Ewing as a relative introvert but outstanding player with the New York Knicks, envisioning him on the sideline leading a team could be a stretch. However, since his retirement from the NBA eight years ago, Ewing has worked as an assistant coach. He has spent the last five years with Orlando and is chiefly responsible for the low-post offensive development of Magic all-star center Dwight Howard.

In the later part of his career, Ewing grew from an on-court leader into a leader in the locker room, too. His voice was the loudest and most respected, and that, coupled with his Hall of Fame career, make him a viable prospect.

Throw in the fact that he impressed Joe Dumars when he interviewed for the Detroit Pistons’ job a year ago and that he and Bobcat owner Michael Jordan have been friends since they entered the league (and shared the same agent, David Falk), and Ewing’s chances increase.

Charlotte surely could use some star power. Jordan’s team set a record in league futility for winning percentage (.106) and let go coach Paul Silas, opening up this opportunity.

The Bobcats also will consider Golden State Warriors assistant Mike Malone, the hottest young assistant in the league and  former Seattle and Portland Trail Blazers coach Nate McMillan.

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top