No Repeat For Swept Mavericks; OKC Too Young and Talented

Oklahoma City could have conceded Game 4 of its first-round series against reigning champion Dallas Saturday. The young and eager Thunder trailed by 13 points on the road with less than 10 minutes remaining. It was then that they showed this could be a special year for them.

With all-stars Kevin Durant and Russell Westbrook at the front of the charge and reserve James Harden holding it all together, OKC fought back and won, 103-97, sweeping the Mavericks in four games. Harden had 15 of his 29 points in the decisive final period, giving pause to the Thunders’ next playoff opponent.

”He was phenomenal,” Durant (24 points) said. ”Tt’s fun to watch, fun to be part of. The best part about our team is that we have a lot of guys who can play off each other, and we complement each other well.”

It was no fun for Mavericks to follow up the franchise’s first championship with a first-round exit. They were oldest team in the NBA this season and just could not keep up with the Thunders’ energy.

”It was an up and down year,” Dallas all-star forward Dirk Nowitzki (34 points) said. “We weren’t consistent enough throughout to be an elite team.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top