Tiger Misses Cut For 8th Time In Career; Frustration Mounts

There will be no sight of Tiger Woods at the Quail Hollow Championship this weekend in Charlotte, as the struggling star failed to make the cut for the eighth time in his illustrious career.

Woods shot a 1-over 73 Thursday for a two-day total of even par, which was not enough to qualify for weekend play. He needed  a collapse by the several players in front of him, which did not happen.

Known for its difficult greens, Quail Hollow exposed Woods’ putting struggles. He had 33 putts on Thursday, which just will not get it done. Quail Hollow is the first course he’s twice failed to make the cut. Woods last missed the cut at the 2011 PGA Championship in Atlanta.

“It’s frustration,” he said after his round. “I’m not playing a weekend where I have a chance to compete for a title. I’ve missed my share of cuts in the past, and none of them feel good.”

Missing out on the weekend is yet another setback for Woods, who remains on the comeback trail. Now some five years removed from his last major championship, Woods’ inconsistency continues to be one of golf’s biggest stories.

The next opportunity to turn around his results is The Players Championship next weekend at TPC Sawgrass in Ponte Verda Beach, Florida.

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top