iPhone Owners: AT&T Chief Regrets Making Unlimited Data Plans For The Apple Device

AT&T’s chief executive dropped a bombshell on iPhone users: he regrets making unlimited data plans for the Apple device.

Rather, CEO Randall Stephenson told a conference in Los Angeles this week, heavy data users should have paid for what they were using, and light users should have paid less, rather than having the light users subsidize the heavy users.

“My only regret was how we introduced pricing in the beginning,” Stephenson said at the Milken Institute’s Global Conference Wednesday. “Because how did we introduce pricing? Thirty dollars and you get all you can eat, and it’s a variable cost model. Every additional megabyte you use in this network, I have to invest capital.”

But the unlimited plan was nixed in 2010, and replaced with a tiered data coverage options. In a New York Times report, Chief Executive of AT&T Mobility Ralph de la Vega said 70 percent of individuals on tiered data plans paid for one of the more expensive options.

Despite some regrets, Stephenson said he doesn’t regret supporting the iPhone. He recalled the board was initially nervous about the pairing: “I remember asking the question: Are we investing in a business model, are we investing in a product or are we investing in Steve Jobs?

“The answer to the question was, you’re investing in Steve Jobs. Let’s go after this thing. And we went after it, and the rest is history.”

AT&T is doing pretty well ($6.1 billion in mobile data revenue last quarter). But Stephenson admitted free messaging services such as Apple’s iMessage that are already tapping into the company’s revenue. He also mentioned Skype as a potential threat to AT&T’s offerings.

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top