Spike Lee Apologizes To Elderly Couple For Exposing Address

Spike Lee has publicly apologized for contributing to the release of an elderly couple’s private address online, after facing intense criticism for his action on Twitter.

The acclaimed filmmaker forced a Florida couple to flee their home after he disseminated their address  across the internet in a tweet.  The Sanford address for Elaine and David McClain had been mistakenly connected to George Zimmerman, the man accused of shooting unarmed teen Trayvon Martin .

Fearing for their lives, the McClain’s have sought refuge in a nearby hotel.  Some of the viral tweets had been accompanied with death threats.

Lee later deleted the tweet well after it was viewed, retweeted, and collected by his 240,000 Twitter followers:

“I Deeply Apologize To The McClain Family For Retweeting Their Address,” he tweeted on Wednesday. “It Was A Mistake. Please Leave The McClains In Peace. Justice In Court.”

Meanwhile, reports have surfaced claiming comedian, actress, and Green Party presidential hopeful Roseanne Barr actually tweeted Zimmerman’s real address; but quickly deleted it , as she tweeted, “vigilante-ism is what killed Trayvon. I don’t support that.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top