Kiefer Sutherland Is Pissed After Fox Pulls Plug on '24' Movie

Kiefer Sutherland is one pissed off Jack Bauer after a dispute over budget and salaries caused 20th Century Fox to slam the brakes on the movie version of his hit television show, 24 , according to a report by TheWrap.

The conspiracy-terrorism-action film was in pre-production phase and scheduled to begin shooting next month. However; because Fox refused to greenlight a budget higher than $30 million, while Sutherland and producer Brian Grazer feels the low $40s is a more reasonable range, the project has come to a halt.

Although a Fox spokesman has confirmed the movie was on hold, they denied it was over a money dispute.

“We’re still working on a script, and hope to make [it] when Kiefer next has time,” the spokesman told the Wrap. “But this all came down to timing, and seven weeks is not enough time to prep a movie like this.”

However; some 24 movie insiders contradict that statement. They argue that Sutherland is absolutely furious that Fox offered him only $1 million upfront  to do the movie and weighted the bulk of the compensation on the back-end . The actor, who is also producing the movie, initially demanded $5 million, according to a source.

Negotiations between the two sides reportedly broke down after differences could not be ironed out in a Wednesday afternoon meeting. As of now, the April date to begin production is up in the air.

Kiefer Sutherland is currently promoting his new Fox Television Network series, Touch.which debuts March 22. There is no word on how this conflict will have an effect on that situation.

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top