Did 'The Batchelor' Ben Flajnik Sink Ratings With Controversial Courtney Robertson Proposal?

Many fans of The Bachelor were shocked that Courtney Robertson walked away with Ben Flajnik’s final rose on Monday’s night season finale; however, not expecting this to happen may be the only reason these fans tuned-in the show in the first place.

So, did viewers dislike Courtney so much that they refuse to watch Flajnik reject Lindzi Cox for her. Judging by the ratings this may be the case. The ABC dating series dropped 40 percent from last season’s finale, achieving an all-time low in the show’s finale viewership!

The two-hour finale drew 9.1 million viewers and a 2.9 rating in the adults 18-to-49 demo. The Bachelor: After the Final Rose special was viewed by 9.8 million people and received a 3.3 rating in the demo, also suffering a 30 percent drop from last year.

Dismal ratings for The Bachelor finale was not the only example of “nothing last forever.”  During the broadcast of After the Final Rose, Ben Flajnik and Courtney Robertson revealed they had already split for a number of weeks immediately after taping of the show.  Still, the couple claims they are back together.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top