Usher Raymond Balks At Ex-Wife’s Request To Pay Legal Bills

Usher Raymond is fighting back. The Grammy winner finds having to pays his ex-wife’s legal fees to fight him in court—absurd, according to TMZ.

After forking over $25,000 to cover the mother of his two sons’, Raymond V and Naviyd, legal fees, Tameka Raymond thinks she deserves another 50 grand to fight the singer-performer in court, get this—to increase child support payments and for full custody of their boys.

The once-happy couple married in 2007 and lasted a couple years before the two went their separate ways in 2009. Every since the divorce proceedings, Tameka has had them entangled in a court battle.

The “Climax” singer filed his own court documents earlier this month after learning of the stylist’s demands.

Tameka has consistently defied court orders and filed frivolous motions which “directly harms the best interests of the minor children” akin to trying to get the court to force him to take a drug test, according to court documents.

As such, Usher’s argument is “such actions should not be tolerated, much less rewarded.” Besides the devoted father insists he carries the brunt of the financial burden already, especially where his children are concerned.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top