Janet Jackson Shrewd About Joining X Factor

Janet Jackson was poignantly shrewd on the Anderson Cooper show on Monday when the host asked the performer if she was indeed a contender for the X Factor show as a judge.

“Oh, my God,” the 45-year-old mustered in between spurts of nervous laughter and gibberish, seemingly caught off guard. “No I’m not a judge on The X Factor.”

Just a week prior, reports were swarming that Whitney Houston was a consideration for one of the two vacant judging seats at X Factor before the untimely death of the superstar. Now the “Control” singer-performer’s name has entered the fray.

Bobbi Kristina Brown Needs Therapy Advises Janet Jackson

Anderson wouldn’t let the “Anytime, Anywhere” singer off that easily—he pried harder.

“You’re not currently a judge on The X Factor?”

“No, I am not,” said Jackson. “But that’s all I really think I should say.”

We think that’s pretty much code for “I’m under a contractual agreement to not talk about my new gig.” LOL!

Why would Simon Cowell want the soft-spoken Miss Jackson?

Simon has previously said that someone experienced in the music business is necessary and their level of success, in terms of the number of units they have moved, could be critical in spotting potential X Factor talent.

Last month, executives along with Simon, axed veteran judge Paula Abdul, newcomer judge Nicole Scherzinger, and host Steve Jones after the trio weren’t bringing in enough ratings for the show.

Do you think Janet would be a great addition to X Factor?

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top