HBO Defends Luck After Horses Perish In Unlucky Incident

HBO is defending its racetrack drama, Luck, after two animals die on the show. During an unlucky incidents on the set of Luck in 2010 and 2011, two horses were reportedly injured and then euthanized while filming the show. The incident drew  criticism from several animal rights groups like PETA.

In response to the controversy, an HBO Rep told E! News in a statement:

From the very outset of this project, the safety of the animals was of paramount concern to us. Recent assertions of lax attitudes or negligence could not be further from the truth. We partnered early on with American Humane Association, who is the only mandated authority in the industry, and we work very closely with the AHA and racing industry experts to implement safety protocols that go above and beyond typical film and TV industry standards and practices.

For example, pre-race exams are performed by a California Horse Racing Board certified veterinarian, and radiographs are taken of the legs of all horses being considered for use in any simulated racing sequences,” the network rep went on. “Everyone associated with Luck cares deeply about the well-being of the horses who are so much a part of the heart and soul of the production.

Luck, which stars Dustin Hoffman, was recently picked up for a second season and is set to start production at the end of February.

Do you think that HBO needs to do more to ensure the safety of the horses while filming the second season of Luck.

 

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top