Daniel Radcliffe Disappointed That The Oscar Committee Failed To Honor 'Harry Potter'

Daniel Radcliffe is angry about how the latest Harry Potter film has been overlooked by the Academy for next month’s Oscars.

The actor said the final installment in the fantasy series, “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2” didn’t get any recognition due to committee’s dislike for commercial films.

The film has only three nominations, but it’s in technical categories. In contrast, Martin Scorsese’s 3D children’s film “Hugo” received 11 Nods and black-and-white silent film “The Artist” got 10.

“I don’t think the Oscars like commercial films, or kids’ films, unless they’re directed by Martin Scorsese,” Radcliffe said. “I was watching Hugo the other day and going, ‘Why is this nominated and we’re not?’ I was slightly miffed.”

He added: “There’s a certain amount of snobbery. It’s kind of disheartening. I never thought I’d care. But it would’ve been nice to have some recognition, just for the hours put in.”

Harry Potter films in the past have been nominated for Oscars – all in technical or craft categories – but none of the films has yet to win a single piece of hardware.

The series has grossed $7.7 billion world wide.

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top