Kelly Clarkson National Anthem: Where Does It Rank?

Next to Whitney Houston’s National Anthem in ’91, Kelly Clarkson takes the cake – or does she?

The former American Idol winner left the theatrics at home or for other entertainers like Christina Aguilera and instead brought a solid, simple and pitch perfect rendition of the ‘The Star Spangle Banner’ at Super Bowl XLVI.

Accompanied by marching band and a children’s chorus, critics are giving Clarkson high marks with some saying she “hit all the right notes” and “In football terms, we call this performance a touchdown.”

Despite her excellent performance Kelly had her doubts when she posted on her Whosay account on Friday,

“Just finished rehearsing the anthem in Indy … wow, I’m actually really nervous about singing at the Super Bowl ha!Here’s hoping I nail it and don’t screw it up!”

No screw ups here! What did you think of Kelly Clarkson’s National Anthem performance? Was it the best? If not who’s done it better? Whitney Houston, Mariah Carey, Faith Hill, Beyonce??

http://youtu.be/HzPTdHUlAkA

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top