People's Choice Awards 2012: Best And Worst Dressed

The 2012 People’s Choice Awards brought out the young stars and other fan favorites at the Nokia Theater in downtown Los Angeles. The first award show of 2012 was hosted by Kaley Cuoco with performances by Demi Lovato and Faith Hill.

Highlights of some winners of the evening includes Demi Lovato who beat out Beyonce, Rihanna and Katy Perry for “Favorite Pop Artist”. Rihanna recovered nicely with a win for Best R&B artist (didn’t know she could be voted for both Pop and R&B).

Katy Perry who backed last minute dominated the awards with trophies for Favorite TV Guest Star, Favorite Female Artist, Favorite Tour Headliner, Favorite Music Video (for “Last Friday Night”) and Favorite Song of the Year (for “E.T.” featuring Kanye West) – talk about an over achiever!

We’ve also accumulated a list of PopularCritic’s pick for best and worst dressed stars.

Best Dressed:

(Footloose actress Julianne Hough)

(Singer Demi Lovato)

(The Help actress Emma Stone)

Undecided

(Glee actress Lea Michele)

(Artist/actress Miley Cyrus)

(Actress Vanessa Hudgens)

Worst Dressed

(X Men actress Jennifer Lawrence)

(Vampire Diaries actress Nina Dobrev)

What do you think of the red carpet at the People’s Choice Award?

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top