Winehouse Toxicology Negative For Illegal Substances: Death Still A Mystery

Results from the toxicology report for the former British songstress Amy Winehouse (who died in her London apartment July 25, 2011) are in, and it confirms that at the time of her death Winehouse had no illegal substances in her system.

This new information continues to fuel the mystery behind Amy’s death given that many believed it was caused by a self induced overdosed brought on from years of drug and alcohol abuse.   Although no illegal substances were cited in the toxicology, Amy reportedly had alcohol in her system at the time of her death.   Examiners remain unclear if or how alcohol may have played a role while not completely ruling it out as a possible contributor.

According to International Business Times, a spokesperson for the family confirmed the toxicology by issuing the following statement;

“Results indicate that alcohol was present, but it can not be determined as yet if it played a role in her death.”

One theory that has emerged is that Amy, who by her father’s account was at least 3 weeks into her sobriety, may have gone into shock after the re-introduction of alcohol in her system. Nevertheless, this still remains a theory given that medical examiners have yet been able to paint a clear picture as to exactly what caused Winehouse’s death.

Winehouse’s toxicology may not have provided any conclusive answers but her family, friends and fans are hoping an October inquest will bring more answers.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top