Kim Kardashian Official Wedding Photo Forgets Kris Humphries

Update-Kim Kardashian’s wedding photo has been released and one important person is missing from the cover: Her husband Kris Humphries!! You know the other half that made this extravagant wedding possible.

People magazine who shelled out a reported $1.5 million for the first wedding pictures defended leaving Kris off the cover.

According to THR, assistant editor Jen Garcia said on Access Hollywood Live Wednesday morning,

“We sorted through thousands of pictures”

“…Looking for ones that didn’t have Kris?” joked guest co-host Arsenio Hall.

“That’s not true!” said Garcia.

“It’s all about the bride. We wanted her. It’s her day, we wanted her on the cover,” said Garcia.

“He’s got a little height on her. It’s kind of tough to get them in the [same] shot.”

Is that really the best excuse she could come up with??

Her husband being left off the cover didn’t keep Kim from gushing about her ‘storybook wedding.’

“I felt like a princess.   Glam aside, that wasn’t our main goal.   It was really about our family and each other.”

Kris added;

“I’m going to remember how perfect it was”

It didn’t take look for Kim Kardashian to prove who’s running this show. It’s also been reported that a pre-nup has been signed!

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top