Jennifer Aniston Clears Up Mix-Up With Chelsea Handler's Beau Andre

Jennifer Aniston stopped by Chelsea Lately to promote her new film “Horrible Bosses”.   Chelsea Handler used to time to promote her hotelier boyfriend Andre Balazs while slightly embarrassing her guest Jennifer Aniston for not knowing who he was.

“Let me tell you a quick little ditty about Jen meeting my boyfriend at her house,” Handler, 36, said during Monday’s episode of Chelsea Lately. “He owns the Chateau Marmont . . . and Jen goes, ‘Oh my God! People die there all the time!'”

“Our friend Alex said, ‘Jen, you know that Andre owns it?'” Handler continued, “And she went ‘Ohhh.'”

Jennifer didn’t seem as bothered by the mix-up. We’re guessing Chelsea got a lot more out of oopsie than anyone else…

In another clip, Chelsea quizzes Jennifer on ditching her girl next door look to play a raunchy character in “Horrible Bosses”.

I’m actually curious to see how this comedy with Jennifer Aniston playing the naughty dentist, Jamie Foxx as the murder consultant and Kevin Spacey as a Horrible Boss will play out. What about you?

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top