Dwyane Wade, 50 Cent Eagerly React to Ludacris’ Post About a (Fake) Money-Tracking Child Support Card

Dwyane Wade, 50 Cent former Golden State Warriors forward Matt Barnes are applauding Ludacris’ Instagram post about a faux debit card that manages how mothers spend child support money.

While Luda’s caption on the Friday, July 28, post was a surprised emoji and #nowthatsludacris, the others were eager to know how to get their hands on the card.

Ludacris won custody of his daughter, Cai Bella Bridges in 2015 and also shares a daughter, Karma Bridges, with wife Eudoxie. Wade has custody of his two children, Zaire and Zion, from his first marriage to Siohvaughn Funches and also has a son, named Xavier, with Aja Metoyer. The Chicago Bulls shooting guard reportedly had to pay $50,000 per month in child support to Metoyer and in May, 50 Cent posted on Instagram that he paid $1.4 million in child support to Shaniqua Tompkins, according to BET.

Luda also started an online debate about who is really at fault for making child support an issue.

Some blamed the men for not being sexually responsible.

Others bashed the mothers of the celebrities’ children and found it humorous that single mothers seemed to be offended.

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top