Michael B. Jordan and Ryan Coogler Vanity Fair Photo Create Firestorm, Reactions Range from Praise to Heavy Criticism

Photograph by Inez and Vinoodh for Vanity Fair

Photograph by Inez and Vinoodh for Vanity Fair

Actor Michael B. Jordan and director Ryan Coogler have sent shock waves through social media after a Vanity Fair photo of the two “embracing” landed on the Internet.

The photo was a glamour shot for a profile piece in Vanity Fair written last week.

The two-time collaborators of critically acclaimed projects like Fruitvale Station and Creed, are seen in a pose that implies that the two are more than just good friends. Others have stated that the photo is an example of a harmless brotherly embrace between two people who respect one another.

On Twitter, Facebook and Instagram, users plastered their various opinions about the two.

In one Facebook post, user Anthony J Dennis stated:

“Whats next for Jordan? Obviously to turn his image into a fag. So predictable, any Black actor thats has success has to be emasculated or his career is over. Disgusting Edomites pushing that disgusting homosexuality, read Leviticus 20:13.

Job 9:24
“The earth is given into the hand of the wicked”

1

2

3

4

5

Many Facebook users felt strongly about the photo because they see it as another attempt at “Black male emasculation” in Hollywood — where Black comedians are put in dresses and Black men have little agency in films. The users are sensing that these two are straying down that “path.”

However, many people did not see it that way. Twitter users thought the photo had a positive message behind it. In fact, many praised it as a symbol of Black brotherhood.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BCpBfpCKVA9/

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top