Newsweek Cover Depicts Obama as Napoleon

A triumphant President Obama is being depicted as the French general and emperor Napoleon on the cover of the latest Newsweek.

The illustration of Obama wearing a blue-and-gold waistcoat, looking like a haughty emperor with the White House in the background, is accompanied by the headline: “The Obama Conquest, Lucky General or Master of the Game?”

The image is sure to draw plenty of praise and scorn. At first glance, the comparison seems apt, since Napoleon is considered a military genius who was always several steps ahead of his opponents as he led the French army to conquer most of Europe in the early 1800’s. Obama’s resounding victory over Romney is already burnishing his image as a master campaign strategist who had the electoral college locked up before the campaign even began with his superior ground game and registration advantages.

But in asking whether Obama’s wins are the result of “luck,” Newsweek will surely piss off many Obama loyalists. With back-to-back decisive wins, with substantial evidence of the years of planning that went into the Obama strategy, with the president’s beginnings as a community organizer being employed in devising a ground game that activated turnout better than any campaign in modern history, many people will wonder why the word “luck” is entering the picture.

There will also be musings about whether Newsweek was referring to the president as a petty tyrant, which is the modern characterization of Napoleon—so much so that the psychological community actually came up with the term “Napoleonic complex” in the early 1900’s to describe someone who has an overbearing personality to make up for his small stature. Clearly the 6-2 Obama is not height-challenged, so that part of the Napoleon comparison doesn’t work—though a closer examination of the average male heights in the early 1800’s revealed that Napoleon was about 5-7, which was average height for men at the time. So a century of psychological evaluation of short obnoxious men was actually based on incorrect information.

In the end, General Obama is likely to not worry much about the Newsweek depiction as he has more important matters to occupy him, such as the running of the globe.

Incidentally the magazine has announced that at the end of the year it will revert to just an online version—but it will continue to produce covers for its tablet format.

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top