Kenyan Presidential Campaign Marred by Legacy of Violent 2007 Election

As Kenyan voters prepare to elect their new president, the shadow of the country’s last presidential election continues to loom over the current campaign. The 2007 vote ended in widespread racial violence, with more than 1,000 people killed and hundreds of thousands more displaced in the months following the polls. With the 2013 polls less than a week away, the focus of the candidates and international onlookers has been the preservation of safety in the country.

Eight candidates participated in the country’s second-ever presidential debate Monday, the first having taken place earlier in the month.

Crowds gathered for the event at the Brookhouse International School in Nairobi, but little could be discerned from the event, according to a report from The Guardian. The news source reported that with such a large field of presidential hopefuls, none of the candidates were able to strongly assert their viewpoints in the very restricted time slots. Furthermore, most of the candidates chose to deflect potentially damning questions, including those regarding their political pasts.

Deputy Prime Minister Uhuru Kenyatta is one of the candidates in the running for the March 4 election, even as he faces charges by the International Criminal Court for his involvement in the violence surrounding 2007 election.

He is accused of committing crimes against humanity for leading the country’s Kikuyu people into racial conflict. Despite the pending trial, Kenyatta is recognized as one of the favorites going into the polls.

“Intimidation, electoral violence and ethnic rivalry have the potential to undermine and jeopardize the whole process,” former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan said in a statement. “And that is why recent violent events and increasing tensions in the run-up to the elections are deeply worrying. Kenya cannot risk a return to those dark days.”

No candidate is currently considered strong enough to break the required 50 percent barrier with voters.

Kenyatta and three other Kenyans charged by the ICC were scheduled to begin trial in April, but issues with the prosecution’s case could push back the proceedings until the summer. Also facing charges are Cabinet Secretary Francis Muthaura, broadcaster Joshua Arap, and former Education Minister William Ruto, who is now Kenyatta’s running mate.

Prosecutors discovered that a key witness in the case lied in court-presented statements, leaving them to open to the defense’s request for a trial delay. ICC judges have not decided whether or not to approve the delays. All four men remain free in Kenya while awaiting trial.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top