Turkey Sends Bombs into Syria to Avenge Killing of Turkish Woman and Children

Syria’s conflict with Turkey has intensified as Turkey continues firing at targets inside Syria in retaliation for Syria killing two Turkish women and three children on Wednesday by sending shells across the border into Turkey.

While Turkey’s leadership says it is not interested in a war with its conflict-torn neighbor, leaders in Damascus want to send Syria a warning that it will not tolerate the indiscriminate killing of its citizens. The Turkish parliament is discussing the possibility of sending troops into Syria.

A Syrian activist group based in the UK confirmed that the Turkish fire has killed several Syrian troops.

Turkey has also asked the UN Security Council to take “necessary action” to stop Syrian “aggression.” Western nations—the U.S., the UK, France and the European Union—have condemned Syria’s actions and NATO has held an urgent meeting to support Turkey, demanding “the immediate cessation of such aggressive acts against an ally.”

On the other hand, Russia, an ally of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, has asked Syria to acknowledge officially that the cross-border attack was “a tragic accident” which will not happen again.

In its retaliatory strikes on Syria, Turkey is sending artillery about 6 miles inside the Syrian border, targeting a district called Tall al-Abyad. To observers, Turkey’s efforts to engage the world community in condemning Syria is a sign that the Turkish government’s patience has run its course and Turkey is preparing for extremely aggressive responses to any Syrian efforts to hurt Turkey or its citizens.

But most experts believe that neither Syria nor Turkey want any kind of war. Turkish public opinion has been staunchly against Turkey getting involved in the Syrian conflict—though public opinion may be moving with the killing of the women and children by Syrian bombs.

In addition, Syrian President Assad already has enough problems dealing with the rebels in his own country over the last 18 months.

According to the BBC, the office of Turkey’s Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said on Wednesday that Turkey would “never leave unanswered such kinds of provocation by the Syrian regime against our national security.”

Syria’s Information Minister Omran Zoabi offered Damascus’s “sincere condolences to the families of the victims and to our friends the Turkish people. The border with Turkey is long, illegal arms trafficking takes place along the border and armed groups move along the border.”

Syria, he said, respected the sovereignty of neighboring countries.

 

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top