How the Red Cross, Clinton Foundation, Foreign Aid Amplified Devastating Impact of Hurricane in Haiti

In an Oct. 7 The Real News profile, reporters examine the roles the United States, U.N., Red Cross and Clinton Foundation played in the 2010 Haitian earthquake recovery.

Over the last week, Haiti has been subjected to intense flooding due to hurricane Matthew. According to The Real News, the devastation has left 350,000 people in need, a cholera outbreak, and countless others without medical supplies or shelter.

This latest report connects the recent recovery to the 2010 relief effort. Recent allegations of misconduct come from a 2015 exposé that revealed that the Red Cross only built six permanent homes after the 2010 catastrophe. The exposé also showed that the half a billion dollars raised was not used to build 135,000 shelters as previously reported.

The Real News contributor Laura Sullivan says the Red Cross did not have a concrete plan to build homes.

“They had the resources. They did not have the knowledge. And one of the senior officials we talked to was in charge of their Haiti shelter program, Lee Mullaney, and he said they just never had a plan for housing.”

The report also alludes to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s role in fixing Haitian elections and the Clinton Foundation’s mishandling of relief efforts. Furthermore, experts in the clip attributed it to Haiti’s current condition.

Lastly, TRRN‘s Jaisal Noor reports that locals have asked foreigners to donate to local charities fearing that the Red Cross would misuse the donations.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top