News

Training Day Director Goes To War With Spike Lee Over Quentin Tarantino Beef

By Stan Castle | Published on January 1, 2013

Spike Lee has managed to start controversy yet again… This time it’s not with one of his political movies, it’s with his recent comments about Quentin Tarantino’s slave film Django Unchained. The directors’ statement hasn’t warranted a response from Tarantino as of yet, but Training Day director Antoine Fuqua has stepped in to defend the Django Unchained director.

Last week, Lee publicly criticized Tarantino on Twitter saying he refused to see Django Unchained because, “American Slavery Was Not A Sergio Leone Spaghetti Western.” Lee also called Tarantino “disrespectful” to his ancestors and says “there is something wrong with” him for his overuse of “the n-word” in his films.

This criticism didn’t sit well with Fuqua, who suggested that Lee is indeed the disrespectful one. “That’s just not the way you do things,” Fuqua told THR at the Capri’s Hollywood Film Festival. “If you disagree with the way a colleague did something, call him up, invite him out for a coffee, talk about it. But don’t do it publicly.”

Fuqua goes on to defend the director’s use of the n-word by saying, “I don’t think Quentin Tarantino has a racist bone in his body. We’re supposed to find some truth in films and if you set a film in the 1850s, you’re going to hear the word ‘nigger,’ because that’s the way they spoke then, and you’re going to discuss slavery because that was part of the reality. I want my kids to hear those kinds of words in the right context, so that they’ll know that language is not OK.”

Subscribe To The ABS Newsletter — Get our stories in your inbox.

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Give once Give monthly Support another way