Racism in the U.S. Military: 8 Disturbing Practices You Should Know About Before Letting Your Teen Sign-Up

Black Soldiers World war 2History of Racism and Discrimination in the Military

Black people served in the U.S. military as early as the 18th century, but it wasn’t until  after World War II, 1948,  that the troops were racially integrated. The military’s view toward African-Americans during World War II reflected that of the wider U.S. culture. According to PBS, a report commissioned by the Army War College considered African-Americans to be “careless, shiftless, irresponsible and secretive” and “unmoral and untruthful.” The accepted viewpoint of the day was that African-American soldiers were not equally capable and would require more intensive leadership than their white counterparts.

 

us soldiersBlacks Still Feeling Sting of Racism in the Military Today

Today only 3 percent of white officers report racial discrimination in the military, compared to 27 percent of Black officers. According to a 2011 PBS article, a congressionally charted commission reported that while non-Hispanic whites make up 66 percent of the U.S. population, they comprise 77 percent of active-duty officers. Additionally, while Blacks account for 13 percent of the U.S. population, they only represent just over 8 percent of active-duty officers. In 2014, among the Army’s main combat units, there was not a single Black colonel among all 25 brigades, according to a September 2014 USA Today article.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top