Uh-Oh, is the New ‘Annie’ Black-Washing Hollywood?

Oscar-nominee Quvenzhane Wallis is causing a stir. Shamefully, not because of her acting chops that established her as the youngest ever nominated for the golden trophy for her portrayal of Hushpuppy in Beasts of the Southern Wild (2012),  but because she will be in the newest film adaptation of Annie, playing the lead role.

By some of the comments you would think she had been cast to play Anne Frank.

Social media and news article backlash ranges from: “I’m not racist or anything, But this new Annie movie is all mixed up!!! Annie is WHITE” to more vulgar disputes not worth mentioning.

There are even those who are against the casting not because of race, but because the depiction is simply not what they are used to. “[This] has everything to do with the aesthetic tradition of the character, and nothing to do with ethnicity.”

Annie is an American classic. A comic strip turned Broadway staple turned iconic film, whose story line holds universal meaning void of racial underpinnings. The original Annie character happened to be a spunky, pale-skinned, freckled-faced ginger, but there is no racial or colorism copyright on circumstance or characterization, although many would like to think so.

Ironically, Black figures, both historical and fictional, have been portrayed by white Hollywood on occasion; Cleopatra played by Elizabeth Taylor and Othello played by a blackfaced Laurence Olivier, being two examples.

White-washing is so commonplace that there is an industry classification for it: race bending.

Race bending or casting a white person in an ethnic role is another way the stories Blacks are enlisted to tell are limited and lack diversity. Some would contend Wallis is simply reversing the bend. Others would argue some things should not be touched.

The ABS Newsletter — Stories that matter, in your inbox.

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Latest from Atlanta Black Star

Back to top