Racism in the U.S. Military: 8 Disturbing Practices You Should Know About Before Letting Your Teen Sign-Up

Racially biased ban of hairstyles in U.S. ArmyUS Military War Against Black Women’s Hair

The military came under fire last year following complaints that their hair rules discriminated against women who wore twisted braids, cornrows and dreadlocks and that using words like “matted and unkempt” to describe them was frankly racist. After much protest from the Black service people and Black hair advocates, such terms have been removed from service grooming policies and the three branches of the U.S. military have also authorized additional hairstyles worn by Black women.  Although Black women won the battle over their hair with the military, the fight still represents how Black soldiers still face the same ongoing racism and discrimination that exists in the broader American society.

 

right wing militias

‘Ban’ of White Supremacists in the US Army Ineffective

The Guardian article “The Modern US Army: Unfit for Service” discusses that in 1996 white supremacist and neo-Nazi groups were banned from the military “after the murder in 1995 of two African-Americans by a neo-Nazi paratrooper stationed at Fort Bragg, North Carolina.”  No one knows how many white supremacists have served since then, but a 2008 report commissioned by the Justice Department found 50 percent of all right-wing extremists in the United States had military experience.

In 2008, Matt Kennard, author of the Guardian article began interviewing Forrest Fogarty, a well-known white supremacist as well as a follower of Adolf Hitler, who served in Iraq as military police for one year. Fogarty said despite the “ban” of hate group members serving in the military in 1996, a year later he was still able to easily join the Army.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top