5 Reasons Often Cited for the Amazing Success of Black Athletes

sprinter vs runner

Physiology

Olympic gold medalist Carl Lewis said, “Blacks — physically in many cases — are made better.” Former Israeli Olympic athlete and biomechanist Gideon Ariel agreed, saying:

“I know that the American system is very sensitive to statements of black and white. But you cannot defy science. You cannot just say that day is night and night is day. These are facts. And I think it’s to the advantage of the black athletes to be proud that God was on their side.”

In a 2010 paper, Adrian Bejan, a professor of mechanical engineering at Duke University, and his colleagues reported that Black people have a higher center of mass (i.e. a shorter relative torso) that favors them in running sports and that white people have a lower center of mass that favors them in swimming.

George Mason University researcher Jon Entine, author of Taboo: Why Black Athletes Dominate Sports and Why We’re Afraid to Talk About It, argued that East Africans, such as Kenyans and Ethiopians, excel in long- and middle-distance running because of their slim bodies, slender legs, a preponderance of slow-twitch muscle fibers and a low heart rate gained from living at a high altitude.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top