5 Historic Examples of Cooperative Economics (Ujamaa) That Advanced The Black Community

Colored Farmers' National Alliance and Cooperative Union

Colored Farmers’ National Alliance and Cooperative Union (CFACU)

The Colored Farmers’ National Alliance and Cooperative Union was formed in 1886 in Texas. Despite the fact that both Black and white farmers faced great difficulties due to the rising price of farming and the decreasing profits that were coming from farming, the protective organization known as the Southern Farmers’ Alliance didn’t allow Black farmers to join.

A group of Black farmers decided to organize their own alliance, to fill their need. The CFACU operated under fear and harassment by white farmers, but managed to operate several cooperatives in the late 19th century before having to disband.

Members of the CFACU shared agricultural techniques and innovations, and coordinated cooperative efforts for planting and harvesting. The Union promoted alliances between farmers and laborers, and was active in local and regional politics in order to maintain rights for African Americans after Reconstruction. It’s estimated that the CFACU had 1.2 million members and was the largest Black organization of its time.

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top