Ashton Kutcher's Alleged Mistress Speaks Out: 'Vindicated'

Ashton Kutcher’s alleged hot tub affair with 22-year-old Sara Leal, may bring the heat to burn him in the same way Tiger Woods got burned playing with fire.  Kutcher’s previous romantic liaisons are surfacing to voice their opinions about Demi Moore’s plans to file a divorce.

Brittney Jones claims that in September of 2010 she had couch sex with the “Two and a Half Men” actor at the same home he then shared with Demi and her daughters — just weeks after rumors surfaced of Ashton fondling a young blonde in a restaurant.  Jones, then 21-years-old, told Star magazine that the two met at a bowling alley and consummated their affair while Demi was out of town.

“He’s a great lover…very considerate and sweet. And it was very special to me.”

Ashton and his reps vehemently denied the accusations, with Kutcher taking to Twitter to dispel the rumors that he was cheating.

“I think Star magazine calling me a ‘cheater’ qualifies as defamation of character. I hope my lawyer agrees,” he wrote.

Brittney Jones went on to create a graphic sex tape that capitalized on the scandal, making her stories of smushing with Ashton less credible.  Now, she tells TMZ that she feels “vindicated” by Demi’s announcement she’s severing ties with Ashton.

“For so long people have thought I was just dishonest or just making up my passionate nights with Ashton, when in fact I was being used… Now I can tell all the facts about how Ashton really was, and hopefully people will believe my side of the story,” she said.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top