Some Fans Worry Spotify Removing R. Kelly’s Music from Playlists Is Censorship

r. kelly

(Photo by Noam Galai/Getty Images)

R. Kelly’s sexual abuse allegations have cost him promotional opportunities on Spotify. The music streaming service announced Thursday, May 10 that it has pulled the singer’s music from editorial and algorithmic playlists as part of a new public hate content and hateful conduct policy it’s enforcing.

“We are removing R. Kelly’s music from all Spotify owned and operated playlists and algorithmic recommendations such as Discover Weekly,” Spotify said in a statement to Billboard. “His music will still be available on the service, but Spotify will not actively promote it. We don’t censor content because of an artist’s or creator’s behavior, but we want our editorial decisions — what we choose to program — to reflect our values. When an artist or creator does something that is especially harmful or hateful, it may affect the ways we work with or support that artist or creator.”

The policy describes hate content as the kind “that expressly and principally promotes, advocates, or incites hatred or violence against a group or individual based on characteristics, including, race, religion, gender identity, sex, ethnicity, nationality, sexual orientation, veteran status, or disability.

“When we are alerted to content that violates our policy, we may remove it (in consultation with rights holders) or refrain from promoting or manually programming it on our service,” it added.

Although R. Kelly has denied the allegations against them since the explosive 2017 report that he had been housing women in his homes as part of a sex cult, women have continued to come forward about his abuse. Among the allegations, women have said he controls what they wear, what they eat and when they use the bathroom. One woman said she was groomed to please him sexually.

Kelly’s team recently issued a statement tackling the accusations directly, saying it is “unjust and off-target” and an “attempted public lynching of a Black man.”

Jonathan Prince, Spotify’s VP/head of content and marketplace policy, said the company decided that in some cases, it may choose not to actively promote an artist whose actions are “egregious” and misaligned with Spotify’s values.

This is the latest hiccup for Kelly, as the #MuteRKelly campaign, which seeks to stop his music from playing, won support from big-name stars like Ava DuVernay and Shonda Rhimes among others. And while calls for the singer’s record label to drop him have not been answered, concerts have been canceled left and right.

In light of Spotify’s removal of Kelly’s music, many Twitter users have been applauding the decision.

“Kudos to Spotify for removing R. Kelly and xxxTentacion from their playlists,” a user said. “No longer actively programming problematic people is a step in the right direction for the industry.”

https://twitter.com/einarwtf/status/994603545784717313

But others claim it’s a form of censorship.

“This is the beginning of a nasty wave of censorship,” one user said.

“As despicable as R. Kelly is, this is a worrying sign,” another posted. “Music platforms should be just that — a platform. They should not dictate what users consume. Curated playlists already have far too much influence imho and this is another step in the wrong direction.”

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top