New York Woman Shocked After Casino Blames ‘Malfunction’ to Withhold her Nearly $43M Win

A New Yorker is furious after she wins big at a casino, but is quickly denied a chance to take home her winnings because of a malfunctioning machine.

Katrina Bookman was ecstatic to find out that she won $42.9 million. So she took a quick selfie in late August at Resorts World Casino in Jamaica, New York. The woman and her party was escorted off the casino floor and was instructed to return the next day.

In a recent interview with ABC 7 New York, Bookman reveals that she had already planned to divide her winnings to help her children, buy her son a barbershop and help her community out. However, her dreams were rapidly ripped from her.

“I said what did I win? [The casino representative said] ‘You didn’t win nothing,'” she recalls.

The casino did not award the woman a $43 million paycheck, instead they offered her a steak dinner. According to ABC 7, the New York State Gaming Commission said that Bookman’s slot machine malfunctioned and that her winnings were a result of that malfunction.

Now, the woman plans to sue the casino. Bookman and her attorney, Alan Ripka, wants the casino to pay up. Moreover, they asking for $6,500—- the maximum allowed on the Sphinx machine. But the gaming commission thinks she is only entitled to$2.25.

“They win and the house doesn’t want to pay out. To me that’s unfair,” Ripka says.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top