This Former Sheriff Can’t Get His Accusations Straight for Why BLM Should be Classified as Hate Group

A former Jacksonville, Florida sheriff is under scrutiny for calling the Black Lives Matter movement a hate group this week.

According to News4Jax, former Sheriff John Rutherford defended his past statements calling the BLM movement a hate group during a 4th Congressional District televised debate on Aug. 18.

The former top cop hopes to fill that seat by attacking the activist movement head on.

“… I said was they should be labeled a hate group,” Rutherford says in the clip. “That’s exactly what I said.  This group, if you look at the rhetoric that’s coming out, marching down the streets of New York talking about frying police officers like pigs in a blanket … And then a couple weeks later, we have a couple of police officers murdered, sitting in their squad car? Yes, they should be labeled a hate group.”

Rutherford adds that the group inspires violence instead of carrying it out themselves.

“Now, they may not go out and commit the violence themselves, but they certainly use their rhetoric to light the fuse.”

Nevertheless, Jacksonville ministers and community leaders called out Rutherford for attempting to discredit the BLM movement.

“… I know these people are not a hate group,” Pastor Frederick Newbill says in an Aug. 18 news conference. ” He’s never had police brutality. He’s never had the things that young African-Americans have in our community. He’s not speaking on my list, he’s just trying to get elected.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top