New Survey Shows Black People Are More Optimistic About the Future Than Whites

Black moneyWhile debate may rage over whether President Barack Obama’s administration has been good for Black people, a Prudential survey says that Black people are doing better financially.

The Prudential survey indicated that African-Americans report a “greater sense of advancement and optimism about their financial situations, compared to the general population.”  Further the survey says that, 58 percent of African Americans indicated they expect the next generation of their family will have a “better financial situation than their own,” compared to only 46 percent of the general population.

The survey findings were revealed by Delvin Joyce, managing director of Prudential’s South Florida Financial Group, at the National Association of Black Journalists conference, held recently in Minneapolis, Minn.

“The African-American Financial Experience” study interviewed 1,043 Black people and 556 general population Americans on a series of financial issues. The survey, carried out by market research firm GfK, talked to people ranging from 25-70 who fell into a variety of income brackets. More than half of the people interviewed made less than $50,000. Four percent of the interviewees made more than $150,000.

The research also revealed African-American responders believed the economy was slowly turning around. According to Prudential, it’s clear that an improving economy is “having a positive impact on the current financial outlook of all Americans.” It also said that 56 percent of Blacks surveyed feel “significantly or somewhat better off now compared to five years ago.” In 2013, less than half of African-American respondents believed they were better off financially, marking an increase in positive outlook.

Another interesting finding from the Prudential survey is Black people are becoming more educated about financial matters.

“More than half of African-Americans in this research consider themselves very well-prepared to make wise financial decisions,” according to Prudential.

Additionally, the majority of African-Americans gave themselves a letter grade of ‘A’ or ‘B’ for their knowledge of handling household budgets, managing money, debt and life insurance protection. But a high-percentage of respondents described themselves as savers instead of investors, which suggests that there’s opportunity for investments.

The Prudential survey refutes opinions put forward by Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, who said that under Obama, Black people were doing “worse than ever.” PolitiFact, a fact-checking site run by The Tampa Bay Times, also says Trump is incorrect.

“The African-American unemployment rate when Obama entered office was 12.7 percent,” reports PolitiFact. “By June 2015, it had fallen to 9.5 percent, a drop of about one-quarter. And compared with its Obama-era peak of 16.8 percent in March 2010, the unemployment rate has fallen by about 43 percent.”

PolitiFact points out that Trump is also incorrect about Obama’s statistics on the Black poverty rate. While the poverty rate did rise among Blacks since 2009, it’s not unprecedented, as it was higher than it is now between 1959 and 1996.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top