5 Reasons The Women’s Liberation Movement Primarily Benefited Caucasian Women

The recent comments by Patricia Arquette after she won an Academy Award highlighted the longtime racial schism in the women’s movement. This is what Arquette said: “So the truth is, even though we sort of feel like we have equal rights in America, right under the surface there are huge issues that are at play that really do affect women. And it’s time for all the women in America, and all the men that love women and all the gay people and all the people of color that we’ve all fought for to fight for us now!” Clearly, in her mind the “we” has never included Black women.womens lib

The Movement Didn’t Include the Experiences of Black Women

Black women who participated in the feminist movement during the 1960s often met with racism, which usually took the form of exclusion: Black women were not invited to participate on conference panels that were not specifically about Black or Third World women, according to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology journal, The Thistle. They were not equally, or even proportionately, represented on the faculty of women’s studies departments, nor were there classes devoted specifically to the study of Black women’s history. In most women’s movement writings, the experiences of white, middle-class women were described as universal “women’s experiences,” largely ignoring the differences of Black and white women’s experiences due to race and class. In addition to this, well-known Black women were often treated as tokens; their work was accepted as representing “the” Black experience and was rarely ever criticized or challenged.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top