10 NBA Players Who Made The Most Money In Their Careers (Spoiler Alert: Jordan and LeBron Did Not Make The List)

Of course no one should feel sorry for Michael Jordan because he’s not on this list. He earned $90,235,000 in his best-of-all-time career (not including the waves of cash from endorsements). But there are dozens of players who have earned more than MJ, including names like Eddie Jones, Damon Stoudamire, Steve Francis, Michael Redd, Erick Dampier, Lamar Odom, Jalen Rose, Mike Bibby, Shawn Marion, Marcus Camby, Kenyon Martin, Brian Grant, Scottie Pippen, Antonio McDyess and on and on. Here are the top earning players in NBA history.

Kevin Garnett1. Kevin Garnett – $315,372,398

Garnett joins baseball’s Alex Rodriguez of the New York Yankees as the only professional athlete in North American sports to eclipse the $300 million mark. “K.G.” was the benefactor of two contracts worth more than $100 million during his 19-year career. He has made at least $20 million seven seasons in his career, including $28 million in 2003-2004 with the Minnesota Timberwolves.

shaq2. Shaquille O’Neal – $292,198,327

Kobe’s longtime running mate with the Lakers—and sometimes adversary—played 19 seasons in the NBA with six different teams. In 1995, he signed as a free agent with the Lakers for $120 million over seven years. Shaq made at least $20 million nine years, including $27.7 million in his first year with the Miami Heat in 2004.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top