Obama Speaks Out on Poverty, Calling Income Inequality the ‘Defining Challenge of Our Time’

President Obama answered critics who have long been calling for him to speak out more on poverty by delivering an impassioned and sometimes personal speech yesterday, calling America’s “dangerous and growing” income equality the “defining challenge of our time.”

The president indicated that he intends to put social mobility at the center of his remaining second-term agenda, an announcement that should please progressives who have criticized him for not paying enough attention to this festering issue.

Obama said the issue of inequality “drives everything I do in this office”—a line that will surely be seized on by his conservative critics who have passed around conspiracy theories for years that the president’s true goal is to take money from whites and redistribute it to people of color.

“The combined trends of increasing inequality and decreasing mobility pose a fundamental threat to the American dream,” Obama said during an impassioned speech at an event organized by the Center for American Progress, a liberal think tank.

The president took the opportunity to link the issue to the need to raise the minimum wage, something he has been calling for but which Congress has ignored.

Obama said increasing income inequality is more pronounced in the United States than in other countries. He said it should “offend” Americans that a child born into poverty has such a hard time escaping it. 

“It should compel us to action. We’re a better country than this,” he said.

Connecting his points to issues like health care and reforming the housing and financial systems, Obama said, “I am convinced that the decisions we make on these issues over the next few years will determine whether or not our children will grow up in an America where opportunity is real.”

He said the country needed to “dispel the myth that the goals of growing the economy and reducing inequality are necessarily in conflict, when they should actually work in concert.”

Obama related the poverty issue to his own life, and that of First Lady Michelle Obama. 

“I’m only here because this country educated my grandfather on the G.I. bill,” Obama said. “When my father left and my mom hit hard times trying to raise my sister and me while she was going to school, this country helped make sure we didn’t go hungry.”

“When Michelle, the daughter of a shift worker at a water plant and a secretary, wanted to go to college, just like me, this country helped us afford it, until we could pay it back.”

After the speech, Dedrick Muhammad, senior director of the economic department at the NACCP, told Al Jazeera that as the president stated, a “relentlessly growing deficit of opportunity is a bigger threat to our future than our rapidly shrinking fiscal deficit.”

“There needs to be a shift from concerns of (fiscal) deficit and the austerity budgets to recognizing the deficit of opportunity for working class, middle class people,” Muhammad said, adding that there needed to be a recognition of the “austerity that Americans are going through because they don’t have money to provide for their families.”

 

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top