4th French Soldier Killed in Mali, Sarkozy Criticizes Intervention

French forces in Bamako

A fourth French soldier has been killed in Mali during a reconnaissance mission near Gao, the main city in the north. And former President Nicolas Sarkozy criticized the French intervention, claiming that it is only serving to “support putschists.”

Brigadier Wilfred Pingaud, 37, who was a member of an artillery regiment, was killed on Wednesday morning when an Islamist militia attacked a detachment of Malian soldiers with which he was on reconnaissance at Tin Keraten, 100 kilometres away from Gao, Defense Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian said in a statement.

Four Malian soldiers were wounded in the fighting, the statement said.

Several dozen rebels have been killed in clashes near Gao over the last few days, according to Paris and Bamako.

Ex-president Nicolas Sarkozy criticized the Mali intervention in an interview with the magazine Valeurs actuelles.

“The rule is never to go into a country that has no government,” Sarkozy told the magazine, a reference to the coup that toppled Mali’s government last year.

“What are we doing there if we’re not just supporting putschists and trying to control a territory four times larger than France with 4,000 men?” he asked.

Source: RFI

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top